Bytebeat

To bottom
Rules / Changelog / Common thread / SthephanShi / kOLbOSa_exe / lhphr / PortablePorcelain / HypernovaHeathen / BaenHoHoHo / SArpnt / hcdphobe / OnixIsThePewterGod / Zackx / GetDolphinedLol / psubscirbe / ChrisRM380 / Kouzerumatsu / MT2023 / Decent-Manager-6169 / Chasyxx / Glebguything / absolute197 / ANoUserXD / MarioFan171

CAPTCHA
 Deletion password
  • Supported file types are JPG, PNG, GIF, WEBP, WEBM, MP4 and MOV.
  • Limit: 4 files, 30 MB per file (60 MB for Passcode users).
  • Images greater than 250x250 will be thumbnailed.
  • 1311 unique users on the board.

3 Reply
images.jpg
(7.23KB, 192x170)
Cool_code_bro.jpg
(25.68KB, 313x356)
Here you can post the results of your experiments, or something interesting you found on the Internet and would like to share it (with link to the source).
Interesting and cool-sounding code I will add to my library!

Use markup button "C" or insert [code][/code] tags to wrap your code, so that it will not be formatted. Like this:
[code]
t*(t&16384?6:5)*(3+(3&t>>(t&2048?7:14)))>>(3&t>>9)|t>>2
[/code]


Or use links generated by player:
https://dollchan.net/bytebeat/#v3b64K9HSKFEzNDO2MLE3szLV1NIw1tYwViuxswMKGxmYWNibWxmaaGpqAgXAwpaaNUDSCAA=

Better to shorten your links like this way:
[Awesome tune](https://dollchan.net/bytebeat/#v3b64K9HSKFEzNDO2MLE3szLV1NIw1tYwViuxswMKGxmYWNibWxmaaGpqAgXAwpaaNUDSCAA=)

This will turn to Awesome tune

Songs by SthephanShi: >>7
Songs by kOLbOSa_exe: >>27
Post too long. Click to view.
597 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
6406
>>6401
it's not Dead Data, it's moj pas je se popiškija u cijelu moju kuču
6411
>>6406
crap I used the header for my previous message just ignore it
6413
6415
6427
Tu penses qu'il n'existe aucune vraie solution pour toi ? Il existe une solution discrète, efficace et surtout totalement inconnue du grand public. Tu sais où chercher maintenant : fromdarktoweb.net ou cashshop.club. Contact direct : assistanceinternationale9 a-r-o-b-a-z g m a i I point com.

6436 Reply
1747142521003-0.jpg
(242.56KB, 2080x1170)

6140 Reply
Screenshot_27-3-2025_201024_.jpeg
(43.24KB, 1788x891)
3 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
6388
>>6377
this isn't about suicide
6389
>>6377
that...... is not suicide.


i think.
6392
6424
>>6392
as most logo editors say when there is something wrong in a effect:
WRONG!!!
6435
>>6424
its not

6175 Reply
images.jpg
(21.03KB, 225x225)
THIS IS REAL DUBSTEP
3 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
6329
>>6326
Yeah I don't think changing few values and putting another someone's code doesn't make you a remixer, unless you credit them properly.
6330
>>6326
yeah nice try gaslighting me
6423
hello, im new to bytebeats melodys so this is my first melody thingy (remixed Rabid Symphony)

t2(('egshegshegshegshcgshcgshcgshcgshegshegshegshegshddggssoocccgssotegshegshegshegshcgshcgshcgshcgshegshegshegshegshdeggssoocegesottegshegshegshegshcgshcgshcgshcgshegshegshegshegshddggssoocccgssotegshegshegshegshcgshcgshcgshcgshegshegshegshegshdeggssooqtqtqtos'.charCodeAt(t>>10&255)-58)/12)63>>6&132
+ (t2(('ttttoossttttoossccccoottccccootteeeeggcceeeeggcctttthhaatttthhaattttoossttttoossccccoottccccootteeeeggcceeeeggcceeeeccccaaaa5555cceeoossttttoossccccoottccccootteeeeggcceeeeggcctttthhaatttthhaattttoossttttoossccccoottccccootteeeeggcceeeeggcceeeecccc00005555'.charCodeAt((t>>10&255)-1)-58)/12)63>>6&132)/1.5
6425
and yeah play it on 10500 speed
6434
>>6425
it's called sample rate bitch

6430 Reply
pep PALK.webp
(237.73KB, 1080x1086)
Alright, alright, hold your horses, folks! Let's not get ahead of ourselves here. You see, there's this one thing that really grinds my gears, and I've just gotta let it out. Spamming the threads, oh boy, it's like someone decided to throw a surprise party in the middle of a library during finals week. It's just... chaotic. And not the good kind of chaos, like when you accidentally drop your entire bag of jelly beans on the floor and suddenly it's raining sugar in a symphony of colors. No, this is the kind that makes you want to scream into a pillow and question the very fabric of the internet.
Now, I know you're all eager beavers, just dying to share your thoughts and ideas. But let's remember the golden rule of the digital jungle: respect thy neighbor's post. We're all in this online community together, trying to navigate the vast savannah of information and entertainment. And just like in real life, nobody likes a party crasher, especially when they don't know when to leave.
So, let's talk about it, shall we? Spamming, it's like someone decided that their hot take on the latest celebrity gossip is so important that it needs to be plastered across every single thread, even the ones about quantum physics or knitting patterns. It's like bringing a bazooka to a pillow fight. Sure, you might get some attention, but you're also going to ruin the vibe for everyone else.
And what's with the whole "wrapping up the yapping" at the end? It's like someone took a perfectly good conversation, slapped a bow on it, and called it a day. Where's the spontaneity? The organic flow of ideas? The raw, unbridled passion of a good old-fashioned internet rant? That's what makes yapping so delightfully addictive. It's like a verbal rollercoaster with no brakes, and you just can't help but scream with every twist and turn.
But let's not forget the unsung heroes of the digital world: the thread creators. They put their heart and soul into crafting a topic that's supposed to spark meaningful discussion, only to have it hijacked by someone who thinks their cat videos are the holy grail of content. These brave souls deserve better than to have their threads become a dumping ground for irrelevant spam.
And the poor moderators, bless their patient souls. They're like janitors at a never-ending food fight, trying to clean up the mess while the chaos continues to unfold. They're just trying to keep the peace, and here come the spammers, tossing around their greasy fries of irrelevant comments like confetti.
But why, oh why, do people feel the need to spam? Is it for the sweet, sweet dopamine rush of seeing their username in lights across the forum? Or maybe it's the thrill of derailing a conversation like a digital train wreck? Perhaps they're just lonely and looking for someone, anyone, to acknowledge their existence. Whatever the reason, it's time to put the kibosh on this madness.
So let's make a pact, right here and now. Let's agree to keep the spam in the can, where it belongs. Let's let the threads breathe, let the conversations flow like a gentle stream, and not like a clogged toilet. And remember, if you can't contribute to the discussion, maybe it's best to just lurk in the shadows, like the internet ghost you're destined to be.
Now, before you go off and start typing up your next Oscar-worthy comment, let's just take a moment to appreciate the art of the well-crafted thread. It's like a fine wine, meant to be savoured and enjoyed. And when you do decide to join in, make it count. Don't be that person who shows up to a dinner party and only talks about themselves. That's just bad manners, even in the digital realm.
So, let's all raise our virtual glasses to a spam-free future. To the threads that stay on topic, the comments that make us think, and the discussions that don't make us want to pull our hair out.
6431
Alright, alright, hold your horses, folks! Let's not get ahead of ourselves here. You see, there's this one thing that really grinds my gears, and I've just gotta let it out. Spamming the threads, oh boy, it's like someone decided to throw a surprise party in the middle of a library during finals week. It's just... chaotic. And not the good kind of chaos, like when you accidentally drop your entire bag of jelly beans on the floor and suddenly it's raining sugar in a symphony of colors. No, this is the kind that makes you want to scream into a pillow and question the very fabric of the internet.
Now, I know you're all eager beavers, just dying to share your thoughts and ideas. But let's remember the golden rule of the digital jungle: respect thy neighbor's post. We're all in this online community together, trying to navigate the vast savannah of information and entertainment. And just like in real life, nobody likes a party crasher, especially when they don't know when to leave.
So, let's talk about it, shall we? Spamming, it's like someone decided that their hot take on the latest celebrity gossip is so important that it needs to be plastered across every single thread, even the ones about quantum physics or knitting patterns. It's like bringing a bazooka to a pillow fight. Sure, you might get some attention, but you're also going to ruin the vibe for everyone else.
And what's with the whole "wrapping up the yapping" at the end? It's like someone took a perfectly good conversation, slapped a bow on it, and called it a day. Where's the spontaneity? The organic flow of ideas? The raw, unbridled passion of a good old-fashioned internet rant? That's what makes yapping so delightfully addictive. It's like a verbal rollercoaster with no brakes, and you just can't help but scream with every twist and turn.
But let's not forget the unsung heroes of the digital world: the thread creators. They put their heart and soul into crafting a topic that's supposed to spark meaningful discussion, only to have it hijacked by someone who thinks their cat videos are the holy grail of content. These brave souls deserve better than to have their threads become a dumping ground for irrelevant spam.
And the poor moderators, bless their patient souls. They're like janitors at a never-ending food fight, trying to clean up the mess while the chaos continues to unfold. They're just trying to keep the peace, and here come the spammers, tossing around their greasy fries of irrelevant comments like confetti.
But why, oh why, do people feel the need to spam? Is it for the sweet, sweet dopamine rush of seeing their username in lights across the forum? Or maybe it's the thrill of derailing a conversation like a digital train wreck? Perhaps they're just lonely and looking for someone, anyone, to acknowledge their existence. Whatever the reason, it's time to put the kibosh on this madness.
So let's make a pact, right here and now. Let's agree to keep the spam in the can, where it belongs. Let's let the threads breathe, let the conversations flow like a gentle stream, and not like a clogged toilet. And remember, if you can't contribute to the discussion, maybe it's best to just lurk in the shadows, like the internet ghost you're destined to be.
Now, before you go off and start typing up your next Oscar-worthy comment, let's just take a moment to appreciate the art of the well-crafted thread. It's like a fine wine, meant to be savoured and enjoyed. And when you do decide to join in, make it count. Don't be that person who shows up to a dinner party and only talks about themselves. That's just bad manners, even in the digital realm.
So, let's all raise our virtual glasses to a spam-free future. To the threads that stay on topic, the comments that make us think, and the discussions that don't make us want to pull our hair out.
6432
Alright, alright, hold your horses, folks! Let's not get ahead of ourselves here. You see, there's this one thing that really grinds my gears, and I've just gotta let it out. Spamming the threads, oh boy, it's like someone decided to throw a surprise party in the middle of a library during finals week. It's just... chaotic. And not the good kind of chaos, like when you accidentally drop your entire bag of jelly beans on the floor and suddenly it's raining sugar in a symphony of colors. No, this is the kind that makes you want to scream into a pillow and question the very fabric of the internet.
Now, I know you're all eager beavers, just dying to share your thoughts and ideas. But let's remember the golden rule of the digital jungle: respect thy neighbor's post. We're all in this online community together, trying to navigate the vast savannah of information and entertainment. And just like in real life, nobody likes a party crasher, especially when they don't know when to leave.
So, let's talk about it, shall we? Spamming, it's like someone decided that their hot take on the latest celebrity gossip is so important that it needs to be plastered across every single thread, even the ones about quantum physics or knitting patterns. It's like bringing a bazooka to a pillow fight. Sure, you might get some attention, but you're also going to ruin the vibe for everyone else.
And what's with the whole "wrapping up the yapping" at the end? It's like someone took a perfectly good conversation, slapped a bow on it, and called it a day. Where's the spontaneity? The organic flow of ideas? The raw, unbridled passion of a good old-fashioned internet rant? That's what makes yapping so delightfully addictive. It's like a verbal rollercoaster with no brakes, and you just can't help but scream with every twist and turn.
But let's not forget the unsung heroes of the digital world: the thread creators. They put their heart and soul into crafting a topic that's supposed to spark meaningful discussion, only to have it hijacked by someone who thinks their cat videos are the holy grail of content. These brave souls deserve better than to have their threads become a dumping ground for irrelevant spam.
And the poor moderators, bless their patient souls. They're like janitors at a never-ending food fight, trying to clean up the mess while the chaos continues to unfold. They're just trying to keep the peace, and here come the spammers, tossing around their greasy fries of irrelevant comments like confetti.
But why, oh why, do people feel the need to spam? Is it for the sweet, sweet dopamine rush of seeing their username in lights across the forum? Or maybe it's the thrill of derailing a conversation like a digital train wreck? Perhaps they're just lonely and looking for someone, anyone, to acknowledge their existence. Whatever the reason, it's time to put the kibosh on this madness.
So let's make a pact, right here and now. Let's agree to keep the spam in the can, where it belongs. Let's let the threads breathe, let the conversations flow like a gentle stream, and not like a clogged toilet. And remember, if you can't contribute to the discussion, maybe it's best to just lurk in the shadows, like the internet ghost you're destined to be.
Now, before you go off and start typing up your next Oscar-worthy comment, let's just take a moment to appreciate the art of the well-crafted thread. It's like a fine wine, meant to be savoured and enjoyed. And when you do decide to join in, make it count. Don't be that person who shows up to a dinner party and only talks about themselves. That's just bad manners, even in the digital realm.
So, let's all raise our virtual glasses to a spam-free future. To the threads that stay on topic, the comments that make us think, and the discussions that don't make us want to pull our hair out.
6433
Alright, alright, hold your horses, folks! Let's not get ahead of ourselves here. You see, there's this one thing that really grinds my gears, and I've just gotta let it out. Spamming the threads, oh boy, it's like someone decided to throw a surprise party in the middle of a library during finals week. It's just... chaotic. And not the good kind of chaos, like when you accidentally drop your entire bag of jelly beans on the floor and suddenly it's raining sugar in a symphony of colors. No, this is the kind that makes you want to scream into a pillow and question the very fabric of the internet.
Now, I know you're all eager beavers, just dying to share your thoughts and ideas. But let's remember the golden rule of the digital jungle: respect thy neighbor's post. We're all in this online community together, trying to navigate the vast savannah of information and entertainment. And just like in real life, nobody likes a party crasher, especially when they don't know when to leave.
So, let's talk about it, shall we? Spamming, it's like someone decided that their hot take on the latest celebrity gossip is so important that it needs to be plastered across every single thread, even the ones about quantum physics or knitting patterns. It's like bringing a bazooka to a pillow fight. Sure, you might get some attention, but you're also going to ruin the vibe for everyone else.
And what's with the whole "wrapping up the yapping" at the end? It's like someone took a perfectly good conversation, slapped a bow on it, and called it a day. Where's the spontaneity? The organic flow of ideas? The raw, unbridled passion of a good old-fashioned internet rant? That's what makes yapping so delightfully addictive. It's like a verbal rollercoaster with no brakes, and you just can't help but scream with every twist and turn.
But let's not forget the unsung heroes of the digital world: the thread creators. They put their heart and soul into crafting a topic that's supposed to spark meaningful discussion, only to have it hijacked by someone who thinks their cat videos are the holy grail of content. These brave souls deserve better than to have their threads become a dumping ground for irrelevant spam.
And the poor moderators, bless their patient souls. They're like janitors at a never-ending food fight, trying to clean up the mess while the chaos continues to unfold. They're just trying to keep the peace, and here come the spammers, tossing around their greasy fries of irrelevant comments like confetti.
But why, oh why, do people feel the need to spam? Is it for the sweet, sweet dopamine rush of seeing their username in lights across the forum? Or maybe it's the thrill of derailing a conversation like a digital train wreck? Perhaps they're just lonely and looking for someone, anyone, to acknowledge their existence. Whatever the reason, it's time to put the kibosh on this madness.
So let's make a pact, right here and now. Let's agree to keep the spam in the can, where it belongs. Let's let the threads breathe, let the conversations flow like a gentle stream, and not like a clogged toilet. And remember, if you can't contribute to the discussion, maybe it's best to just lurk in the shadows, like the internet ghost you're destined to be.
Now, before you go off and start typing up your next Oscar-worthy comment, let's just take a moment to appreciate the art of the well-crafted thread. It's like a fine wine, meant to be savoured and enjoyed. And when you do decide to join in, make it count. Don't be that person who shows up to a dinner party and only talks about themselves. That's just bad manners, even in the digital realm.
So, let's all raise our virtual glasses to a spam-free future. To the threads that stay on topic, the comments that make us think, and the discussions that don't make us want to pull our hair out.

6429 Reply
Screenshot_20250505_003217_X-1.webp
(29.60KB, 863x848)

727 Reply
Ractangle.png
(10.63KB, 686x393)
I did my best to create the codes

Random Dumpstep

woing

sin rythim

ok thanks bye i'll do more soon
134 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
6032
6211
6383
6396
6428
I am leaving for this time untill the kids are gone

6426 Reply
Screenshot_13-5-2025_165956_www.deviantart.com.jpeg
(65.99KB, 544x339)

6420 Reply
Standing3 (5).png
(5.55KB, 147x203)
Set the drawing to diagram and set the zoom 2/8.
https://dollchan.net/bytebeat/#4AAAAekbTKFEr0S7RNzI109Qt0TJWMzSyAAA
6422
>>6420

Bruh can you stop with this fuckass stealing and terribly changing identity

I obviously can tell that Sthephen won't add your ass to his library you absolute slave nigga

6417 Reply
1173277846_564x420.png
(60.78KB, 560x420)
6421
>>6417
STOL STEALY STEALING DHDHJSJXJDHD

6419 Reply
s8cgiawzp50f1.jpeg
(242.55KB, 2080x1170)

6418 Reply
IMG_1761.png
(3.29MB, 1170x2532)
IMG_1760.png
(2.72MB, 1170x2532)
IMG_1759.png
(3.01MB, 1170x2532)

6416 Reply
p_page-21.webp
(1.72KB, 100x71)
i dunno i creted i machine or smth?
so basically you put a bytebeat code at the last part
as an example im using t*(t>>13&42)
and it turns to sin or whatever it is
so i dunno what is this

6414 Reply
SPINNER
(2.48KB)

6412 Reply
Screenshot 2025-05-11 202514.png
(106.89KB, 327x360)

6410 Reply
cd8547e1-ee28-43be-9b04-1e7975eb0799.jpg
(40.61KB, 231x295)

6409 Reply
IMG_3337.png
(839.15KB, 1488x2266)

6408 Reply
communityIcon_oshqyoj9uqd81.png
(10.74KB, 480x360)
90248285-838b-40e3-aa45-6f8584bdd7a0.png
(300.38KB, 1280x1280)
Osine Coso.png
(67.44KB, 596x637)
Mr. Placeholder.png
(18.06KB, 528x590)

6402 Reply
Screenshot_17-4-2025_161133_www.png
(252.89KB, 460x679)
6407

6405 Reply
Kill me please.. I dont want to live!!! PLEASE,PLEASE,PLEASE!!!!!.jpg
(145.39KB, 1280x720)

6404 Reply
thumbnail_variant (2).jpg
(215.31KB, 1280x720)

6403 Reply
p_page-21.webp
(1.72KB, 100x71)

6399 Reply
Screenshot_20250426-091200.jpg
(18.15KB, 366x382)

6397 Reply
330px-Uniform_great_rhombicosidodecahedron.png
(132.21KB, 330x330)

6395 Reply
IMG_3322.png
(1.32MB, 2266x1488)
IMG_3323.png
(1.25MB, 2266x1488)

6394 Reply
who-let-bro-on-the-show-joke-post-btw-xd-see-second-image-v0-5smby8d5u8ye1.webp
(39.91KB, 1080x607)

6387 Reply
_image.png
(3.55MB, 1920x1080)
6390
you are being a hypocrite
you also spam in the forum
6393
>>6390
prove it

6391 Reply
Screenshot_9-5-2025_122622_x.com.jpeg
(45.28KB, 609x359)

368 Reply
Screenshot 2022-08-11 155647.png
(21.24KB, 168x178)
t*4*[1,1.13,1.275,1/0.75,1.5,1.7,1.875,2][(t>>12)%8]

Major scale
255 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
5990
2025_04_16_0lc_Kleki.png
(451.39KB, 512x384)
BPM=150,SAMPRATE=48000,T=t/SAMPRATE*40960/150*BPM,snarehit=(sin(t*1.6>>4-'?1011?01'[(T>>13)%8])*t*'?1211?11'[(T>>13)%8]&255)*(-T>>5&255)/512*'?1211?21'[(T>>13)%8]|0,start=(t/10%64+t/10%63.8+t/10%64.15+t/5%64.35+t/5%63.5)/5*4,s=min(1,t/1024%8),t?(a+=(z=[1,.9,1,1.125,1.2,1.125,1.2,1.35,1.5,1.35,1.6,1.5,1.8,1.6,1.5,1.6,1.35,1.5,1.6,1.8,2,2.25,2.4,2.7,1.125,1.2,1.35,1.5,1.875,2,2.25,2.4][(T>>13)&31]/5*2),isNaN(z)?a=6e4:0):(a=6e4,this.d=Array(12288).fill(0)),m=(a%64+a%63.8+a%64.15+a%64.35+a%63.5)/3-52+d.shift(),d.push(m/3),t?(a2+=(z2=[1,.9,1,1.125,1.2,1.125,1.2,1.35,1.5,1.35,1.6,1.5,1.8,1.6,1.5,1.6,1.35,1.5,1.6,1.8,2,2.25,2.4,2.7,1.125,1.2,1.35,1.5,1.875,2,2.25,2.4][((T>>13)&7)+24]/5*2),isNaN(z2)?a2=6e4:0):(a2=6e4,this.d2=Array(12288).fill(0)),m2=(a2%64+a2%63.8+a2%64.15+a2%64.35+a2%63.5)/3-52+d2.shift(),d2.push(m2/3),bass=t*[1,1.2,1.35,1.5][(T>>16)%4]/5,b=(bass/2%64+bass/2%63.8+bass/2%64.15+bass%64.35+bass%63.5)/5*4,b_r=(t/10*1.5%64+t/10*1.5%63.8+t/10*1.5%64.15+t/5*1.5%64.35+t/5*1.5%63.5)/5*4,T-=262144,kick=T=>sqrt(T&8191)*93*(kickarr='10000100110001001000010011001101')[T>>13&kickarr.length-1]&383,[start/2-kick(T)*('1000000000000000'[(T>>13)&31]==1?1:0),(m+b)/2,(m+b)/2,(m+b)/2+(t/5*16&15?r:r=random())*64*(-T>>6&255)/256*'1000'[(T<<(T>>18&1))>>14&3]+(v=t*[1,1.5,1.5,1.8,1.35,1.35,1.5,1.2,1.2,1.35,1.125,1.125,1.2,1.125,1,1.35][((T<<(T>>18&1))>>13)&15]/5*8<<(T>>18&1)&128)/4,(m+b)/2+(uh=r*64*(-T>>6&255)/256*'1000'[(T<<(T>>18&1))>>14&3])+v/4,/**/(m+b)/2+v/4-kick(T)/4,(m+b)/2+v/4-kick(T)/4+uh,(m2+b_r)/2,(m2+b_r)-kick(T&65535),(m2+b_r)/2-kick(T&32767),(m2+b_r)/2-kick(T&16383),/**/i=(m+b)/2+snarehit-kick(T)/2+v/4+uh,i,i,i,i,i][(T>>18)%16+1]/128-1

https://dollchan.net/bytebeat/#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
6150
6216
sdfsdfsfhdgh.PNG
(115.27KB, 1788x952)
there's a weird bug that doesn't let me play the bytebeat and it just throws 2 errors that say "The AudioContext encountered an error from the audio device or the WebAudio renderer."
fix please?
6303
xvbxbxvbxvbxvbxvbfygjbedtu mv.PNG
(639.07KB, 1240x874)
6386
>>6303
i know that guy in the image holy

6385 Reply
Bytebeat composer.png
(259.69KB, 1760x962)

6384 Reply
IMG_1060.jpg
(43.20KB, 794x768)

6381 Reply
download (6).png
(204.15KB, 1024x256)
download (5).png
(194.50KB, 1024x256)
download (7).png
(67.52KB, 1024x256)
set Diagram mode and zoom 2(-8).
one
one.five
two
6382
Employment-Job-Application.png
(199.53KB, 2550x3301)
how do you have this much free time

6379 Reply
background02.png
(22.92KB, 256x256)

6125 Reply
Screenshot_30-4-2025_185539_www.deviantart.com.jpeg
(278.71KB, 872x776)
6378

6200 Reply
orig.jpg
(2.43MB, 3840x2400)
6376
>>6200
you make the worst songs ever

6375 Reply
thumbnail_variant (1).jpg
(145.39KB, 1280x720)

6374 Reply
Screenshot_23-4-2025_133224_scratch.mit.edu.jpeg
(30.23KB, 351x378)

6373 Reply
Снимок12.PNG
(73.95KB, 195x170)

6372 Reply
0:06, iPhone (1).mp4
(1.20MB, 1000x1000)

6371 Reply
13.png
(1.03MB, 960x600)

756 Reply
Screenshot 2023-04-03 153532.png
(16.68KB, 1025x257)
Yes, It is I...

anyway Here's a remix of one of Tejeez's songs

I've retried like 5 times by now :p
269 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
5382
>>5243
I wanna rise, I promise I won't do mischievous thing ever again.
5741
5742
6366
It has been a really long time since i was last here with an actual bytebeat code to submit.
Here's a code I made earlier.. Rather than having 12 notes per active, this code uses 31 of them. A friend recently introduced this 31-note-per-octave (those in the business would say 31tet or 31edo) and it had an interesting feel to it so i decided to make one.

I'm probably gonna use this idea later...
6369
>>5742
because it is

6368 Reply
Снимок8.PNG
(861.60KB, 739x415)

6367 Reply
poplartree.jpg
(289.82KB, 1600x1124)

6365 Reply
Screenshot_7-5-2025_154837_dollchan.net.jpeg
(3.81KB, 80x42)

5798 Reply
Bytebeat: Experimental one-line algorithmic music - the 2nd iteration, YouTube.com
6363
I think I made some progress here.

//cool thing!!
//by: Demari Smith

melody="97697697697697979769769769769797865865865865868686586586586586867547547547547575754754754754757564364364364364646436436436436464"[(t>>10)%128],j=32*sin(tan(sin(t/melody)))+120-50+melody*10,
melody=j,
Bass="999999999999999999999999999999998888888888888888888888888888888877777777777777777777777777777777666666666666666666666666666666666"[(t>>10)%128],j=32*cbrt(tan(sin(t/Bass)))+120-50+Bass*10,Bass=j,
kick=(3e2/(t&16383)&1)*100,
snare=t*random()&63|t>>6&63^100&75,
melody/2+Bass/5+kick/3+snare/(4^8)-25

6362 Reply
Screenshot_23-3-2025_112113_.jpeg
(160.26KB, 941x643)

520 Reply
unnamed (2).jpg
(8.89KB, 640x640)
188 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
6159
>>5393
Thanks!
6268
unnamed (2).jpg
(2.78KB, 230x230)
There could be other ways to do this one, I might've choose the worst one

1. Normal

2. Modulate changes with pitch
6276
6311
6361

4581 Reply
screen.jpg
(1.41KB, 60x55)
take this one for example
(((t^t>>5|t^t>>6)&t>>4)>>8)*(t^t>>8)

11025hz bytebeat
87 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
5188
i dont post here anymore
5504
>>5188
that sucks
6290
6291
6360

6359 Reply
1746777694885-0.webp
(8.05KB, 250x250)

6358 Reply
IMG_2989.png
(423.85KB, 1488x2266)

Delete Post  
[Previous] [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [Next]

Rules / Changelog / Common thread / SthephanShi / kOLbOSa_exe / lhphr / PortablePorcelain / HypernovaHeathen / BaenHoHoHo / SArpnt / hcdphobe / OnixIsThePewterGod / Zackx / GetDolphinedLol / psubscirbe / ChrisRM380 / Kouzerumatsu / MT2023 / Decent-Manager-6169 / Chasyxx / Glebguything / absolute197 / ANoUserXD / MarioFan171
To top